Your basketContinue to checkout

Your basket is empty.

To request a quote or invoice, add the items first: the request sends the items in your basket.

Browse planners and resources

The basket shows up to 10 different items. Review your complete basket at checkout; a quote or invoice request includes every item.

Request a quote or invoice

Include your school’s purchase order number if you have one.

Your current basket’s products, selected options, SKUs and quantities will be included. Prices and delivery are confirmed when we issue the quote or invoice.

Schools similar to Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery

Essex · ages 2 to 11 · URN 152157

Change schoolSchool detailsShare

10 similar schools

Method

HeadteacherChat intake matches; separate from DfE’s official groups.

Showing the closest 10 of 2,140 eligible schools.

1Greenland Community Primary School

County Durham · ages 2 to 11 · URN143585

318 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 2 April 2025
  • Outcome: Improved significantly
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.2 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 2.1 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 5.19 percentage points lower
  • 36 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00669. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.2 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00090.
  • First language other than English: difference 2.1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00525.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 5.19 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.01037.
  • Total pupils: difference 36 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01017.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

2Jesmond Gardens Primary School

Hartlepool · ages 2 to 11 · URN143215

355 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 10 July 2024
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 3.2 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 1.7 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 4.89 percentage points lower
  • 1 more pupil
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.0087. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 3.2 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01440.
  • First language other than English: difference 1.7 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00425.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 4.89 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00977.
  • Total pupils: difference 1 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00028.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

3Harrow Gate Academy

Stockton-on-Tees · ages 2 to 11 · URN141301

432 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 11 June 2024
  • Overall effectiveness: Good
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Outstanding
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 2.4 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 3 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 0.49 percentage points lower
  • 78 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01733. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 2.4 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01080.
  • First language other than English: difference 3 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00750.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.49 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00097.
  • Total pupils: difference 78 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01806.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

4Rainbow Forge Primary Academy

Sheffield · ages 2 to 11 · URN143997

347 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 5 December 2023
  • Overall effectiveness: Good
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.3 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 2.1 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 13.13 percentage points lower
  • 7 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01934. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.3 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00585.
  • First language other than English: difference 2.1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00525.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 13.13 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.02626.
  • Total pupils: difference 7 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00198.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

5Bexhill Academy

Sunderland · ages 2 to 11 · URN136487

360 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Report card inspection · 16 June 2026
  • Safeguarding standards: Met
  • Inclusion: Strong standard
  • Curriculum and teaching: Expected standard
  • Achievement: Strong standard
  • Attendance and behaviour: Strong standard
  • Personal development and wellbeing: Strong standard
  • Early years: Exceptional
  • Leadership and governance: Strong standard
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 7.2 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 0.6 percentage points lower
  • SEND: 1.97 percentage points lower
  • 6 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Report card inspection · inspected 16 June 2026 · published 23 September 2026 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Safeguarding standards: Met; Inclusion: Strong standard; Curriculum and teaching: Expected standard; Achievement: Strong standard; Attendance and behaviour: Strong standard; Personal development and wellbeing: Strong standard; Early years: Exceptional; Leadership and governance: Strong standard

  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 8 June 2022 · published 27 July 2022 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Outstanding; Quality of education: Outstanding; Behaviour and attitudes: Outstanding; Personal development: Outstanding; Leadership and management: Outstanding; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Outstanding

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.0195. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 7.2 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.03240.
  • First language other than English: difference 0.6 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00150.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 1.97 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00394.
  • Total pupils: difference 6 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00167.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

6Rosebrook Primary School

Stockton-on-Tees · ages 2 to 11 · URN143145

407 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 4 February 2025
  • Overall effectiveness: Not judged
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.4 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 4.6 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 1.82 percentage points lower
  • 53 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 4 February 2025 · published 27 March 2025 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Not judged; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01997. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.4 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00180.
  • First language other than English: difference 4.6 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.01150.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 1.82 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00364.
  • Total pupils: difference 53 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01302.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

7Dial Park Primary School

Stockport · ages 2 to 11 · URN150460

350 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 24 January 2023
  • Overall effectiveness: Good
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.4 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 7.8 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 6.75 percentage points lower
  • 4 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 24 January 2023 · published 13 March 2023 · recorded under URN 106043 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Good; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.02042. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.4 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00630.
  • First language other than English: difference 7.8 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.01950.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 6.75 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.01349.
  • Total pupils: difference 4 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00113.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

8Thorpedene Primary School & Nursery

Southend-on-Sea · ages 2 to 11 · URN143336

421 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 7 January 2025
  • Overall effectiveness: Not judged
  • Quality of education: Requires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Requires improvement
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Requires improvement
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 2.5 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 5.1 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 1.49 percentage points lower
  • 67 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 7 January 2025 · published 4 February 2025 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Not judged; Quality of education: Requires improvement; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Requires improvement; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Requires improvement

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.0229. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 2.5 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01125.
  • First language other than English: difference 5.1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.01275.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 1.49 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00298.
  • Total pupils: difference 67 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01591.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

9Crags Community School

Rotherham · ages 2 to 11 · URN143481

409 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 27 February 2024
  • Overall effectiveness: Requires improvement
  • Quality of education: Requires improvement
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 6.2 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 0.7 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 0.46 percentage points higher
  • 55 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 27 February 2024 · published 25 April 2024 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Requires improvement; Quality of education: Requires improvement; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.02402. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 6.2 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.02790.
  • First language other than English: difference 0.7 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00175.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.46 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00092.
  • Total pupils: difference 55 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01345.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

10Viewley Hill Academy

Middlesbrough · ages 2 to 11 · URN140505

301 pupils / 354 at Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Report card inspection · 7 July 2026
  • Safeguarding standards: Met
  • Inclusion: Expected standard
  • Curriculum and teaching: Needs attention
  • Achievement: Needs attention
  • Attendance and behaviour: Expected standard
  • Personal development and wellbeing: Expected standard
  • Early years: Needs attention
  • Leadership and governance: Expected standard
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 2.5 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 0.1 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 8.83 percentage points lower
  • 53 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Report card inspection · inspected 7 July 2026 · published 29 September 2026 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Safeguarding standards: Met; Inclusion: Expected standard; Curriculum and teaching: Needs attention; Achievement: Needs attention; Attendance and behaviour: Expected standard; Personal development and wellbeing: Expected standard; Early years: Needs attention; Leadership and governance: Expected standard

  • Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 15 June 2022 · published 21 September 2022 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Outcome: School remains Good

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.02414. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 2.5 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01125.
  • First language other than English: difference 0.1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00025.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 8.83 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.01766.
  • Total pupils: difference 53 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01497.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

Comparison saved on . Figures have their own reporting years; check these before using differences in a meeting.

Open the saved comparison

Copy that page’s address to share the same schools, figures and filter. The latest 13 weekly comparisons are kept; older links can expire. Keep a separate record for meeting papers.

Use this comparison

Choose a sheet for your task. It uses the selected school and the peers in your shortlist.

Selected school evidence

All figures and Ofsted for Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery

Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery

Essex · ages 2 to 11 · URN152157

KS2 cohort count unavailable. Small-cohort check unavailable.

Spring Meadow Primary School & Nursery: published figures and their sources
MeasureSpring Meadow Primary School & Nursery
Pupils3542025/26
Free school meals48.3%2025/26
First language other than English4.2%2025/26
SEND (SEN support or EHC plan)34.75%2025/26+ source
KS2 expected standardMissingNot available in this comparison
KS2 higher standardMissingNot available in this comparison
Overall absence9.21959%2025/26 · Autumn and spring term
Persistent absence31.33803%2025/26 · Autumn and spring term
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 28 February 2024 · published 24 April 2024 · recorded under URN 114834 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Good; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school record

How schools are matched

We compare open primary schools in England that teach through to age 11. We match current eligibility for free school meals first, then first language other than English, SEND and pupil numbers. The same age range is preferred. Region, faith and school type have a smaller influence.

A similar intake does not explain a difference in results. Use this list to choose schools to investigate, then check their reports and local circumstances.

View the matching calculation and data sources

SEND is calculated from pupils with SEN support or an EHC plan, divided by the school roll. We only calculate it when the source counts, year and coverage agree. It is rounded to two decimal places here.

Matching weights: FSM 45%, EAL 25%, SEND 20%, pupil numbers 10%. Lower matching scores mean more similar pupil context. Context bonuses can take a score below zero; a score is not a rating or a percentage.

Open England GIAS Primary; statutory low age at most 5 (including nursery ages 2/3) and high age 11. All four inputs required in the same academic year. Prefer exact low/high ages when at least 10 candidates remain after the report-card filter; otherwise disclose relaxation. Outcomes never select or rank peers. Context bonuses require nonmissing exact region, religious character and establishment type code; missing context earns no bonus. Lower distance is closer, including negative totals after bonuses.

2140 schools were eligible; 10 are shown.

  • fsm: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100
  • eal: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100; First language other than English
  • send: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100
  • size: Absolute pupil-count difference / max(target pupils, candidate pupils)

SEND formula: 100 * (SEN_support + EHC_plan) / characteristics.pupils; same school, Academic year and year; SEN total_pupils must equal characteristics.pupils. Ties are resolved by URN ascending.

Schools can be excluded for more than one reason:

  • Not a primary school: 21888
  • Does not cover the full primary age range: 28649
  • Not open: 25399
  • England location unverified: 3045
  • FSM percentage missing: 192
  • First-language percentage missing: 192
  • Pupil number missing: 192
  • SEND: published SEN support, EHC plan or pupil total missing: 192
  • The selected school: 1
  • Different age range: 11956

Missing means no usable figure was provided. Suppressed means the publisher withheld it. Unavailable means no usable value can be shown; check the source and published code. Not applicable and low reliability retain the publisher’s stated limits.

Comparison reference: htc-full-primary-v1:2026-10-19.

Related guides

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.