Your basketContinue to checkout

Your basket is empty.

To request a quote or invoice, add the items first: the request sends the items in your basket.

Browse planners and resources

The basket shows up to 10 different items. Review your complete basket at checkout; a quote or invoice request includes every item.

Request a quote or invoice

Include your school’s purchase order number if you have one.

Your current basket’s products, selected options, SKUs and quantities will be included. Prices and delivery are confirmed when we issue the quote or invoice.

Schools similar to Crumpsall Lane Primary School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN 105486

Change schoolSchool detailsShare

10 similar schools

Method

HeadteacherChat intake matches; separate from DfE’s official groups.

Showing the closest 10 of 5,731 eligible schools.

1St Luke's CofE Primary School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN105503

405 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 9 May 2024
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.5 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 0.7 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 2.11 percentage points lower
  • 13 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00133. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.5 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00225.
  • First language other than English: difference 0.7 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00175.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 2.11 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00422.
  • Total pupils: difference 13 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00311.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

2Irk Valley Community School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN105452

437 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 5 May 2023
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.6 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 3.4 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 6.73 percentage points higher
  • 19 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00351. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.6 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00720.
  • First language other than English: difference 3.4 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00850.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 6.73 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.01346.
  • Total pupils: difference 19 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00435.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

3Co-op Academy Brownhill

Leeds · ages 3 to 11 · URN138986

434 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 4 July 2023
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1 percentage point higher
  • First language other than English: the same
  • SEND: 3.91 percentage points higher
  • 16 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00601. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00450.
  • First language other than English: difference 0 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00000.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 3.91 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00782.
  • Total pupils: difference 16 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00369.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

4James Watt Primary School

Birmingham · ages 3 to 11 · URN134102

423 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 9 October 2024
  • Outcome: Some aspects not as strong
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 2.7 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 3.4 percentage points lower
  • SEND: 2.59 percentage points lower
  • 5 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00701. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 2.7 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01215.
  • First language other than English: difference 3.4 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00850.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 2.59 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00517.
  • Total pupils: difference 5 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00118.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

5Westminster Primary School

Birmingham · ages 3 to 11 · URN143943

464 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 9 April 2025
  • Outcome: Standards maintained
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.6 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 0.1 percentage points lower
  • SEND: 1.23 percentage points lower
  • 46 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00982. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.6 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00720.
  • First language other than English: difference 0.1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00025.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 1.23 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00245.
  • Total pupils: difference 46 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00991.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

6Shaw Hill Primary School

Birmingham · ages 3 to 11 · URN103157

474 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 14 March 2023
  • Outcome: School remains Outstanding
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.8 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 3.1 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 3.71 percentage points lower
  • 56 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01058. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.8 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00360.
  • First language other than English: difference 3.1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00775.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 3.71 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00742.
  • Total pupils: difference 56 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01181.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

7Nelson Mandela School

Birmingham · ages 3 to 11 · URN103384

435 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 2 July 2024
  • Overall effectiveness: Good
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Requires improvement
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 3.9 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 1 percentage point higher
  • SEND: 3.63 percentage points higher
  • 17 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 2 July 2024 · published 18 July 2024 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Good; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Requires improvement

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01122. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 3.9 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01755.
  • First language other than English: difference 1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00250.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 3.63 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00726.
  • Total pupils: difference 17 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00391.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

8Caldmore Primary Academy

Walsall · ages 3 to 11 · URN143904

436 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 18 March 2025
  • Overall effectiveness: Not judged
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.7 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 3.8 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 0.14 percentage points higher
  • 18 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 18 March 2025 · published 5 May 2025 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Not judged; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01155. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.7 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00765.
  • First language other than English: difference 3.8 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00950.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.14 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00027.
  • Total pupils: difference 18 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00413.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

9Mauldeth Road Primary School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN105426

410 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 22 March 2023
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 5.3 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 2.6 percentage points lower
  • SEND: 5.48 percentage points lower
  • 8 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01323. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 5.3 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.02385.
  • First language other than English: difference 2.6 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00650.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 5.48 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.01097.
  • Total pupils: difference 8 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00191.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

10Bantock Primary School

Wolverhampton · ages 3 to 11 · URN151993

434 pupils / 418 at Crumpsall Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 22 November 2022
  • Overall effectiveness: Good
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.3 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 3.9 percentage points lower
  • SEND: 4.61 percentage points lower
  • 16 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01401. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.3 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00135.
  • First language other than English: difference 3.9 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00975.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 4.61 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00923.
  • Total pupils: difference 16 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00369.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

Comparison saved on . Figures have their own reporting years; check these before using differences in a meeting.

Open the saved comparison

Copy that page’s address to share the same schools, figures and filter. The latest 13 weekly comparisons are kept; older links can expire. Keep a separate record for meeting papers.

Use this comparison

Choose a sheet for your task. It uses the selected school and the peers in your shortlist.

Selected school evidence

All figures and Ofsted for Crumpsall Lane Primary School

Crumpsall Lane Primary School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN105486

KS2 cohort: 57 eligible pupils. DfE KS2 · 2024/25 · Academic year · Final · source 2026-05-21

Crumpsall Lane Primary School: published figures and their sources
MeasureCrumpsall Lane Primary School
Pupils4182025/26
Free school meals53.8%2025/26
First language other than English68.2%2025/26
SEND (SEN support or EHC plan)18.9%2025/26+ source
KS2 expected standard60%2024/25 · Academic year · Final
KS2 higher standard2%2024/25 · Academic year · Final
Overall absence6.01442%2025/26 · Autumn and spring term
Persistent absence18.10585%2025/26 · Autumn and spring term
School websiteOfficial school record

How schools are matched

We compare open primary schools in England that teach through to age 11. We match current eligibility for free school meals first, then first language other than English, SEND and pupil numbers. The same age range is preferred. Region, faith and school type have a smaller influence.

A similar intake does not explain a difference in results. Use this list to choose schools to investigate, then check their reports and local circumstances.

View the matching calculation and data sources

SEND is calculated from pupils with SEN support or an EHC plan, divided by the school roll. We only calculate it when the source counts, year and coverage agree. It is rounded to two decimal places here.

Matching weights: FSM 45%, EAL 25%, SEND 20%, pupil numbers 10%. Lower matching scores mean more similar pupil context. Context bonuses can take a score below zero; a score is not a rating or a percentage.

Open England GIAS Primary; statutory low age at most 5 (including nursery ages 2/3) and high age 11. All four inputs required in the same academic year. Prefer exact low/high ages when at least 10 candidates remain after the report-card filter; otherwise disclose relaxation. Outcomes never select or rank peers. Context bonuses require nonmissing exact region, religious character and establishment type code; missing context earns no bonus. Lower distance is closer, including negative totals after bonuses.

5731 schools were eligible; 10 are shown.

  • fsm: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100
  • eal: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100; First language other than English
  • send: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100
  • size: Absolute pupil-count difference / max(target pupils, candidate pupils)

SEND formula: 100 * (SEN_support + EHC_plan) / characteristics.pupils; same school, Academic year and year; SEN total_pupils must equal characteristics.pupils. Ties are resolved by URN ascending.

Schools can be excluded for more than one reason:

  • Not a primary school: 21888
  • Does not cover the full primary age range: 28649
  • Not open: 25399
  • The selected school: 1
  • England location unverified: 3045
  • FSM percentage missing: 192
  • First-language percentage missing: 192
  • Pupil number missing: 192
  • SEND: published SEN support, EHC plan or pupil total missing: 192
  • Different age range: 8365

Missing means no usable figure was provided. Suppressed means the publisher withheld it. Unavailable means no usable value can be shown; check the source and published code. Not applicable and low reliability retain the publisher’s stated limits.

Comparison reference: htc-full-primary-v1:2026-10-19.

Related guides

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.