Your basketContinue to checkout

Your basket is empty.

To request a quote or invoice, add the items first: the request sends the items in your basket.

Browse planners and resources

The basket shows up to 10 different items. Review your complete basket at checkout; a quote or invoice request includes every item.

Request a quote or invoice

Include your school’s purchase order number if you have one.

Your current basket’s products, selected options, SKUs and quantities will be included. Prices and delivery are confirmed when we issue the quote or invoice.

Schools similar to Crab Lane Primary School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN 105465

Change schoolSchool detailsShare

10 similar schools

Method

HeadteacherChat intake matches; separate from DfE’s official groups.

Showing the closest 10 of 5,731 eligible schools.

1Elms Farm Community Primary School

Birmingham · ages 3 to 11 · URN103381

414 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Report card inspection · 13 January 2026
  • Safeguarding standards: Met
  • Inclusion: Strong standard
  • Curriculum and teaching: Expected standard
  • Achievement: Expected standard
  • Attendance and behaviour: Expected standard
  • Personal development and wellbeing: Expected standard
  • Early years: Expected standard
  • Leadership and governance: Strong standard
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 3.2 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 1.2 percentage points lower
  • SEND: 0.64 percentage points higher
  • 2 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Report card inspection · inspected 13 January 2026 · published 16 March 2026 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Safeguarding standards: Met; Inclusion: Strong standard; Curriculum and teaching: Expected standard; Achievement: Expected standard; Attendance and behaviour: Expected standard; Personal development and wellbeing: Expected standard; Early years: Expected standard; Leadership and governance: Strong standard

  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 22 September 2021 · published 20 October 2021 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Good; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score -0.00085. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 3.2 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01440.
  • First language other than English: difference 1.2 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00300.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.64 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00127.
  • Total pupils: difference 2 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00048.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

2Westmorland Primary School

Stockport · ages 3 to 11 · URN132121

436 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 19 July 2023
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.9 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 9.6 percentage points lower
  • SEND: 0.36 percentage points higher
  • 24 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00428. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.9 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00405.
  • First language other than English: difference 9.6 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.02400.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.36 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00072.
  • Total pupils: difference 24 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00550.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

3Barford Primary School

Birmingham · ages 3 to 11 · URN103162

409 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 7 November 2023
  • Overall effectiveness: Good
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 2.9 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 5.4 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 0.14 percentage points higher
  • 3 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.00755. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 2.9 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01305.
  • First language other than English: difference 5.4 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.01350.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.14 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00027.
  • Total pupils: difference 3 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00073.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

4Oasis Academy Harpur Mount

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN139056

443 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 27 March 2024
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 2.9 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 2.4 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 2.1 percentage points higher
  • 31 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01024. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 2.9 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.01305.
  • First language other than English: difference 2.4 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00600.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 2.1 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00419.
  • Total pupils: difference 31 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00700.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

5Higher Openshaw Community School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN105471

326 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 22 June 2023
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.6 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 1.1 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 8.55 percentage points higher
  • 86 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01342. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.6 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00270.
  • First language other than English: difference 1.1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00275.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 8.55 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.01709.
  • Total pupils: difference 86 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.02087.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

6Hoxton Garden Primary

Hackney · ages 3 to 11 · URN131141

344 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 9 July 2025
  • Outcome: Improved significantly
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.1 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 3.2 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 2.77 percentage points higher
  • 68 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.015. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.1 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00495.
  • First language other than English: difference 3.2 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00800.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 2.77 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00555.
  • Total pupils: difference 68 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01650.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: same published context; contribution -0.01000.

7Seymour Road Academy

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN139078

448 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 10 July 2024
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 5.7 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 0.2 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 0.59 percentage points lower
  • 36 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01536. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 5.7 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.02565.
  • First language other than English: difference 0.2 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00050.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.59 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00118.
  • Total pupils: difference 36 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00804.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

8St James' CofE Primary School Gorton

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN141689

466 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Ungraded inspection (previous framework) · 5 May 2023
  • Outcome: School remains Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 0.1 percentage points higher
  • First language other than English: 1.5 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 6.23 percentage points higher
  • 54 more pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.01825. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 0.1 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00045.
  • First language other than English: difference 1.5 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00375.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 6.23 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.01246.
  • Total pupils: difference 54 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.01159.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

9Crosslee Community Primary School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN149867

373 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Report card inspection · 19 May 2026
  • Safeguarding standards: Met
  • Inclusion: Expected standard
  • Curriculum and teaching: Expected standard
  • Achievement: Needs attention
  • Attendance and behaviour: Needs attention
  • Personal development and wellbeing: Expected standard
  • Early years: Expected standard
  • Leadership and governance: Expected standard
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.5 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 1 percentage point lower
  • SEND: 11.58 percentage points higher
  • 39 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Report card inspection · inspected 19 May 2026 · published 5 July 2026 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Safeguarding standards: Met; Inclusion: Expected standard; Curriculum and teaching: Expected standard; Achievement: Needs attention; Attendance and behaviour: Needs attention; Personal development and wellbeing: Expected standard; Early years: Expected standard; Leadership and governance: Expected standard

  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 8 November 2022 · published 17 January 2023 · recorded under URN 105412 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Category of concern: Special Measures; Overall effectiveness: Inadequate; Quality of education: Inadequate; Behaviour and attitudes: Inadequate; Personal development: Inadequate; Leadership and management: Inadequate; Safeguarding is effective: No; Early years: Inadequate

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.02188. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.5 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00675.
  • First language other than English: difference 1 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.00250.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 11.58 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.02316.
  • Total pupils: difference 39 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00947.
  • region: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

10Paganel Primary School

Birmingham · ages 3 to 11 · URN150148

404 pupils / 412 at Crab Lane Primary School2025/26 · Academic year

Add to comparison
Graded inspection (previous framework) · 10 March 2020
  • Overall effectiveness: Good
  • Quality of education: Good
  • Behaviour and attitudes: Good
  • Personal development: Good
  • Leadership and management: Good
  • Safeguarding is effective: Yes
  • Early years: Good
Why it matched
  • Free school meals: 1.5 percentage points lower
  • First language other than English: 8.9 percentage points higher
  • SEND: 0.87 percentage points lower
  • 8 fewer pupils
Sources, Ofsted & match details
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 10 March 2020 · published 10 May 2020 · recorded under URN 134281 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Good; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school recordFind schools like this one
Matching score and calculation

Score 0.02269. A lower score means more similar pupil context. It is not a school rating or a percentage.

  • FSM eligible (current eligibility): difference 1.5 percentage points; weight 45%; contribution 0.00675.
  • First language other than English: difference 8.9 percentage points; weight 25%; contribution 0.02225.
  • SEN support and EHC plans (derived percentage): difference 0.87 percentage points; weight 20%; contribution 0.00174.
  • Total pupils: difference 8 pupils; weight 10%; contribution 0.00194.
  • region: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.
  • faith: same published context; contribution -0.01000.
  • governance: no matching bonus; contribution 0.00000.

Comparison saved on . Figures have their own reporting years; check these before using differences in a meeting.

Open the saved comparison

Copy that page’s address to share the same schools, figures and filter. The latest 13 weekly comparisons are kept; older links can expire. Keep a separate record for meeting papers.

Use this comparison

Choose a sheet for your task. It uses the selected school and the peers in your shortlist.

Selected school evidence

All figures and Ofsted for Crab Lane Primary School

Crab Lane Primary School

Manchester · ages 3 to 11 · URN105465

KS2 cohort: 50 eligible pupils. DfE KS2 · 2024/25 · Academic year · Final · source 2026-05-21

Crab Lane Primary School: published figures and their sources
MeasureCrab Lane Primary School
Pupils4122025/26
Free school meals62.6%2025/26
First language other than English36.9%2025/26
SEND (SEN support or EHC plan)18.45%2025/26+ source
KS2 expected standard56%2024/25 · Academic year · Final
KS2 higher standard0%2024/25 · Academic year · Final
Overall absence5.55755%2025/26 · Autumn and spring term
Persistent absence15.36232%2025/26 · Autumn and spring term
  • Graded inspection (previous framework) · inspected 29 October 2024 · published 28 November 2024 · monthly file dated 30 September 2026

    Overall effectiveness: Not judged; Quality of education: Good; Behaviour and attitudes: Good; Personal development: Good; Leadership and management: Good; Safeguarding is effective: Yes; Early years: Good

School websiteOfficial school record

How schools are matched

We compare open primary schools in England that teach through to age 11. We match current eligibility for free school meals first, then first language other than English, SEND and pupil numbers. The same age range is preferred. Region, faith and school type have a smaller influence.

A similar intake does not explain a difference in results. Use this list to choose schools to investigate, then check their reports and local circumstances.

View the matching calculation and data sources

SEND is calculated from pupils with SEN support or an EHC plan, divided by the school roll. We only calculate it when the source counts, year and coverage agree. It is rounded to two decimal places here.

Matching weights: FSM 45%, EAL 25%, SEND 20%, pupil numbers 10%. Lower matching scores mean more similar pupil context. Context bonuses can take a score below zero; a score is not a rating or a percentage.

Open England GIAS Primary; statutory low age at most 5 (including nursery ages 2/3) and high age 11. All four inputs required in the same academic year. Prefer exact low/high ages when at least 10 candidates remain after the report-card filter; otherwise disclose relaxation. Outcomes never select or rank peers. Context bonuses require nonmissing exact region, religious character and establishment type code; missing context earns no bonus. Lower distance is closer, including negative totals after bonuses.

5731 schools were eligible; 10 are shown.

  • fsm: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100
  • eal: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100; First language other than English
  • send: Absolute percentage-point difference / 100
  • size: Absolute pupil-count difference / max(target pupils, candidate pupils)

SEND formula: 100 * (SEN_support + EHC_plan) / characteristics.pupils; same school, Academic year and year; SEN total_pupils must equal characteristics.pupils. Ties are resolved by URN ascending.

Schools can be excluded for more than one reason:

  • Not a primary school: 21888
  • Does not cover the full primary age range: 28649
  • Not open: 25399
  • The selected school: 1
  • England location unverified: 3045
  • FSM percentage missing: 192
  • First-language percentage missing: 192
  • Pupil number missing: 192
  • SEND: published SEN support, EHC plan or pupil total missing: 192
  • Different age range: 8365

Missing means no usable figure was provided. Suppressed means the publisher withheld it. Unavailable means no usable value can be shown; check the source and published code. Not applicable and low reliability retain the publisher’s stated limits.

Comparison reference: htc-full-primary-v1:2026-10-19.

Related guides

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.